Welcome! Wikis are websites that everyone can build together. It's easy!

Psychology journal entry

Psychology journal entry - Psychology

NYT > Psychology


Scientific American - Mind


Respond to the following questions after reading journals, articles or studies. Responses should be written in short paragraphs referring to, or citing information/data the article presents.

Source of Article: ___________
Title: __________________ Date:__________

(1) What new information did you learn?



(2) What is your opinion of the research processes? Is it ethical or exploitive? What are the weaknesses and biases to the research?


(3) What further research could be conducted in this area?



(4) How does this information relate to you?



Latest page update: made by mcvean , Sep 8 2007, 9:27 PM EDT (about this update About This Update mcvean Edited by mcvean

63 words added

view changes

- complete history)
Keyword tags: None
More Info: links to this page

Anonymous  (Get credit for your thread)


(Showing the last 5 of 6 - view all)
Started By Thread Subject Replies Last Post
Megooo psych journal - Mego 0 Sep 13 2007, 12:29 AM EDT by Megooo
Thread started: Sep 13 2007, 12:29 AM EDT  Watch
Respond to the following questions after reading journals, articles or studies. Responses should be written in short paragraphs referring to, or citing information/data the article presents.

Source of Article: NY Times
Title: You, Your Friends, Your Friends of Friends
Date: August 5th, 2007

(1) What new information did you learn?
The new information that i learned from this was that not only are friends influential in smoking, or drink. They can also be influential in eating. Obesity spreads from friends to friends. If one person sees their friends eating more, they tend to do the same. Also, depression spreads from friend to friend

(2) What is your opinion of the research processes? Is it ethical or exploitive? What are the weaknesses and biases to the research?
I enjoyed reading this article because i feel it is partly true. The weakness is that this case was probably only tested on Americans. Maybe in different cultures the case might be different. That makes this article a bit bias. It could also just be for certain cities. Maybe instead of Ney York doing this project, maybe Kansas could do it and see if there is a difference.

(3) What further research could be conducted in this area?
The further reasearch i would conduct would be to test different countries and different cities in American and study the data to see the differences. Maybe in different countries it would be the complete opposite and if so why?


(4) How does this information relate to you?
Do you find this valuable?    
Keyword tags: None
taniahueting psych journal-Tania 0 Sep 12 2007, 11:54 PM EDT by taniahueting
Thread started: Sep 12 2007, 11:54 PM EDT  Watch
Source of Article: NY times Title: Young Athletes Try New Coach:

(1) What new information did you learn?
i found out that their are phycologists who are interested in the sports field.

(2) What is your opinion of the research processes? Is it ethical or exploitive? What are the weaknesses and biases to the research?
I belive that the research processes is quiet amazing. it is ethical. my weaknesses are learning about sports altho i dont play any.

(3) What further research could be conducted in this area?
this can be conducted on famous sports players or people who want to become famous sports stars.


(4) How does this information relate to you?
it doesnt really relate to me since im not a student athlete.
Do you find this valuable?    
Keyword tags: None
HenryChan Psych journal-Henry Chan 0 Sep 10 2007, 6:09 AM EDT by HenryChan
Thread started: Sep 10 2007, 6:09 AM EDT  Watch
Source of Article: Scientific America.com
Title: Human Toddlers Trump Apes on Social Skills
Date: September 7th,2007

(1) What new information did you learn?
I learn that an infant child has better social skills than apes. The article suggested that we used to believe that our intelligence skill is better than apes due to the size of human brain to be three times bigger. But now they changed the theory into where we are more intelligent than Ape in intelligence involving social skills. They then performed a few tests and the result is that an infant is in fact more intelligent than ape in adapting skills as well.


(2) What is your opinion of the research processes? Is it ethical or exploitive? What are the weaknesses and biases to the research?
I think it may be exploitive however I think it should be ethical enough. I think that these kinds of research will help a lot of studies in evolution of human. The weaknesses of this research should be because the size of the human brain is different from an ape; we should expect great results anyway. Also, the age of apes ranged too far to really see the difference between an infant with an ape.

(3) What further research could be conducted in this area?
We could research on how animals behave in a social contact situation. For example, an infant with its mother and an ape with its mother; We can then spot out the real difference between human infant and an ape in a family. Also we might test reactions of an outsider coming into their environment. This will also tell us the difference.

(4) How does this information relate to you?
This information relates to me simply because I am a human and I would certainly like to know the difference between our evolutionary ancestor and us. This will then help us how our mind works comparing to an ape’s mind.
Do you find this valuable?    
Keyword tags: None
diane_1008 psychology journal 0 Sep 6 2007, 11:03 AM EDT by diane_1008
Thread started: Sep 6 2007, 11:03 AM EDT  Watch
Respond to the following questions after reading journals, articles or studies. Responses should be written in short paragraphs referring to, or citing information/data the article presents.

Source of Article: ____New York Times_______
Title: ____Perfect Pitch: “You’ve Either Got It or You Don’t”______________ Date:__9/6/07________

(1) What new information did you learn?
Researchers have discovered that perfect pitch may be genetic. Also evidence showed that as people get older they experience a shift in pitch-naming, several of the older of the older participants were consistently shifting to sharp in their categorizations. People who have perfect pitch essentially have ranges of acoustic frequencies in “bins” corresponding to different notes.

(2) What is your opinion of the research processes? Is it ethical or exploitive? What are the weaknesses and biases to the research?
I think it’s exploitive and the weakness of it was that perfect pitching might also caused by the outer environment, people could improve their pitching if they had learned music or worked hard on music theories. I think it might have just been that they same family both have interest or influences of music due to the other related family members.

(3) What further research could be conducted in this area?
I think they could focus on more of the genetic part of the experiment; they could test and find what or how genes actually cause the perfect pitching of people.

(4) How does this information relate to you?
I started to learn music when I was 6, and music stands as a great part of my life. When I was learning music theory, the hardest part for me was the pitching part, where u had to recognize the notes. When I read this article I felt that the experiment is really related to me and found it interesting that perfect pitch could be caused by genetics.


Do you find this valuable?    
Keyword tags: None
mikechan23 do i paste this here? 0 Sep 6 2007, 7:17 AM EDT by mikechan23
Thread started: Sep 6 2007, 7:17 AM EDT  Watch
Respond to the following questions after reading journals, articles or studies. Responses should be written in short paragraphs referring to, or citing information/data the article presents.

Source of Article: NY times Title: Young Athletes Try New Coach: The Psychologist Date: 6.9.07

(1) What new information did you learn?
I learned that there are actually psychologists involved in sports.

(2) What is your opinion of the research processes? Is it ethical or exploitive? What are the weaknesses and biases to the research?
I am extremely interested in this, helping people overcome their fears in sports seems to be very exciting, I don’t think the essay was biased (or perhaps I’m biased to say that).

(3) What further research could be conducted in this area?
I think instead of focusing on young athletes, that it is time to move into the professional leagues, such as the NBA or NFL.


(4) How does this information relate to you?
As a student athlete, I feel that it is beneficial to know all about the ways to help improve my level of play.
Do you find this valuable?    
Keyword tags: None
(Showing the last 5 of 6 - view all)
Top Contributors